Reflexion "artistic"
Subject A is a musician.
Subject B is a painter.
Subject C is an architect.
the subject to a record company "buys" a record for an amount "X".
The subject B a restaurant you order a mural an amount "X". The subject C
a municipality pays an amount "X" to an auditorium / museum little and it works (unlike some city of culture
....) The album's subject A is successful and offers More give 5 concerts, an amount "Y" of money.
The mural of the subject B is so good that many people go to the restaurant just to see the pitch muraly eat, of course, which the restaurant owner, increases profits.
The auditorium of the subject C meets the expectations even is so beautiful that people will see it and not only for exhibitions and concerts.
The mural of the subject B became so famous that the city decides to buy the owner of the restaurant uan approximate amount of "2X" and expose its attractive auditorium / museum (which was the subject C) and fixed there, to have even more pull and continuing to sell tickets, not only see inside museum but to see the famous mural.
to give more hype to the issue yet, lso museum directors decided that the city's orchestra play disk versions of the subject to how successful, which is managed by an organization for the subject to an amount with respect to Z Copyright and all those things.
So the inauguration day of the council is lined with entrances to these 3 things conbined of success, and then follow with success thanks to the nice Plate and the museum itself.
------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------
Subject To win a sum of money equal to X + Y + Z Subject B
win an amount equal to X, I buy the box and sold it luegogo won a number of 2X. Subject C
won
X.
So seriously, why hosts musicians are the artists who complain about piracy, pasta that does not win, that they steal money etc etc ....? and more importantly why do noses and with justification that a musician charged for each time you hear his song but paint does not charge for each person who sees his picture, for example?.
0 comments:
Post a Comment